Verbind je met ons


De vergrijzing van de beroepsbevolking en de daling van de uitgaven vormen een tikkende tijdbom, zegt het Europees Defensieagentschap




2dd251cThe European Defence Agency has warned of a ticking timebomb of an ageing workforce, a decline in spending and paucity of new major programmes.  The Brussels-based agency says the sector will have to “diversify” its activities to adapt to a “changing environment” or risk a “divorce” between Europe and its defence industry.  The pessimistic scenario comes in an in-depth analysis by the EDA of current trends affecting Europe’s defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). 

The findings coincide with what the agency warns of “new threats” on the international stage, including Islamic terrorism, and at a time when European armed forces are increasingly being called upon to contribute to the defence of European borders, such as with the current migrant crisis.

The European Defence Agency (EDA) says Europe’s defence industry faces a ticking timebomb –  Fabio Liberti, a project officer with the EDA who is in charge of defence and industry analysis, said the agency’s assessment shows that “dedicated actions must be taken” to strengthen the EDTIB.  The agency says Europe’s defence sector is extremely competent and competitive but that “not everything can be read and analysed through rose-coloured glasses”.

Liberti cautions that “several negative trends” are affecting the industry, forcing European defence industries to operate in a “very difficult environment”.  The EDA, which is an agency of the European Union with an annual budget of €30.5 million, states that defence investment spending is constantly decreasing.  In real terms, total defence expenditure has fallen by 15% since 2006 while increasing elsewhere in the world such as the so-called BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China, it says.

“Secondly, there are no new major defence programmes in the pipeline, a situation that will potentially affect Europe’s ability to design and manufacture complex weapon systems in the future,” added Liberti.  In its analysis, the agency cautions that without new programmes, it will be “increasingly complicated” to retain in Europe the “key skills and industrial capacities” needed to manufacture and maintain defence systems.

“Also,” it goes on, “around one third of the European defence industrial workforce is aged over 50, with the industry facing the risk for a substantial loss of expertise when these individuals reach retirement age.”  The agency, established in 2004 and which reports to EU member states, also says that without new programmes, “there is a very serious risk” that the defence industry will lose most of its attractiveness for young engineers, “who might want to choose a career in the commercial sector.

“Meanwhile,” it adds, “American companies are becoming more and more competitive on the global stage.”  The defence industry develops equipment tailored to the needs of Europe’s armed forces but the agency says that “without a strong defence industrial sector, the freedom of action of EU countries can be seriously compromised”.


Liberti said: “There also seems to be a growing tendency to see military activities as a problem for a company rather than an opportunity.”  The EDA says that in order to adapt to a “changing environment”, European defence firms will have to “diversify their activities”, increasing the share of their turnover generated from the civilian market.  Eventually, in a sector historically characterized by strong ties between governments and defence contractors, a “loosening” of these ties is happening.  EU countries affected by the economic downturn have tried to preserve ‘jobs at home’ and European defence industries are getting “more national and more international, but not more European”.

The risk, says Liberti, is a ‘divorce’ between Europe and its defence industry, with a consequent serious impact in terms of security of supply.”  Reaction to the analysis was swift with senior UK Conservative MEP Geoffrey Van Orden, a member of the European Parliament’s Security and Defence Committee and a former brigadier in the British Army, saying: “Many of our defence industries have been under pressure since the so-called ‘peace dividend’ after the collapse of communism.”

He added: “While the demand for major weapons platforms has reduced, new technologies to deal with cyber conflict and the need for precision and remote targeting have enabled some sectors to prosper. I would like to see British-based defence industries being well supported by the British government and be more ambitious in seizing overseas market opportunities, not least in countries of traditional British influence.”

Verder commentaar kwam van Europarlementariër Mike Hookem, defensiewoordvoerder van de UK Independence Party, die zei: “Het risico van een scheiding tussen de EU en haar defensie-industrie is nu een grote bedreiging, en zowel het VK als Europa moeten heel voorzichtig zijn om dat niet te doen. zorgen voor een ‘brain drain’ van defensiefabrikanten, ontwerpers, ingenieurs en banen in de defensieproductie naar landen als de VS en China, die nog steeds investeren in onderzoek en ontwikkeling van nieuwe defensietechnologieën.

“Als we naar de huidige staat van de Britse en Europese defensie-uitgaven in het algemeen kijken, is het duidelijk dat er sprake is van een gezamenlijke afbouw van de nationale defensie-uitgaven en van lange termijn defensieprojecten, als onderdeel van het streven naar een Europees leger.”

Deel dit artikel:

EU Reporter publiceert artikelen uit verschillende externe bronnen die een breed scala aan standpunten uitdrukken. De standpunten die in deze artikelen worden ingenomen, zijn niet noodzakelijk die van EU Reporter.